-
pt I think it’s “guilty of defrauding investors, not guilty of defrauding patients” that people are objecting to.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +3 🙂
-
pt Probably worth a discussion of the standards for legal culpability — I would bet that the investor fraud didn't require mens rea, the patient fraud did.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -5 🙁
-
pt Same problem with things like shoplifting vs wage theft — one is strict liability (if you did it, you’re guilty) and the other is not (you have to prove intent or negligence)Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood -3 🙁
-
pt (This is the same problem with the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict — it was *correct* but the underlying self-defense laws and the way they allow judicial discretion in when they can be used are problematic)On twitter.com
Mood -2 🙁